Give it your experimental results and get back a conference-format paper draft, covering experiment design, ablations, related work, and references. ## What it does - **Conference-format drafts:** results shaped into a paper in the expected structure - **Experiment & ablation sections:** methodology and ablations written from your data - **Related work:** prior art positioned around your contribution - **References:** citations formatted to the venue ## Where it fits - **A grad student writing up:** "Draft the methods and ablations from these results." Sections ready to edit. - **A researcher prepping a submission:** "Structure this into a conference paper." A formatted draft to refine. - **A team racing a deadline:** "Write the related-work section around these citations." A positioned draft to tighten. ## How it works 1. **Give it your results:** data, settings, and the contribution. 2. **It drafts the paper:** structure, ablations, related work, and references. 3. **You get a draft back:** conference-format sections to edit and submit. Built for graduate students and researchers. Every draft is yours to verify, edit, and stand behind.
122 ratings · showing the 12 most relevant
James L.
Used this to structure my CV paper on object detection after getting messy experimental results. The agent helped me organize ablation studies and write a coherent related work section in under an hour. Saved me days of writing time.
李明 M.
非常有帮助！我用它来整理NLP模型的实验数据，生成的论文框架直接可以投顶会。格式规范，参考文献自动补全。
Priya K.
Great for getting a first draft of my vision transformer paper. The experiment design section was solid, though I had to rewrite some of the ablation analysis to match my actual findings. Would have been 5 stars if it asked clarifying questions upfront.
Chen W.
Used it to draft a paper on neural architecture search. The skill pulled relevant references and framed my contributions clearly against existing work. Published at CVPR with minimal edits to the output.
Sofia R.
Helpful but not perfect. The related work section sometimes mixed up paper dates and occasionally cited similar-sounding work incorrectly. I had to fact-check everything. Still saved time overall though.
Yuki T.
素晴らしい！MLパイプのテスト結果をアップロードしたら、ICCV形式の論文ドラフトが出てきた。実験設計の記述が特に良かった。
Marcus H.
Used this for my NLP fine-tuning paper. Good at structuring the methodology and generating reference lists. The writing felt a bit templated in places—had to add more personality to the introduction and conclusion.
Fatima A.
Fantastic for organizing my CV experiments. I fed in my results tables and the agent wrote ablation analyses that were actually insightful, not just surface-level. Helped me spot what was really driving performance.
David K.
Struggled with custom datasets. The skill assumed standard benchmarks and didn't adapt well when I provided proprietary results. Needed heavy hand-editing to make it relevant to my work.
Zara P.
Wrote my first conference paper using this. The structured approach to related work forced me to think critically about positioning. Output was near-publication quality after one revision pass. Highly recommend for first-time authors.
Rodrigo S.
Good tool for getting past writer's block. Especially strong at the experiment design and ablation sections. References sometimes needed verification, but the overall framework was sound for my 3D vision paper.
Hana B.
Used for drafting an NLP paper on prompt engineering. The skill produced a well-organized structure with proper section transitions. Submitted to ACL with minimal changes. Great time-saver.